The Ukrainian president has suspended his secret service chief and childhood friend Ivan Bakanov as well as Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova, citing dozens of cases of suspected collaboration with Russia by officials in their agencies. Europe’s press speculates about what is going on behind the scenes.
Today, Europe’s press debates the dismissal of multiple leading figures in Ukrainian politics and government organizations. Here are some opinions from a selection of European publications presented by eurotopics.
JOIN US ON TELEGRAM
Follow our coverage of the war on the @Kyivpost_official.
Still opaque
Correio da Manhã wonders what is behind the dismissal of Iryna Venediktova:
“This is the biggest purge of high-ranking officials since the start of the war. The reasons for Bakanov’s dismissal are clear; in Venediktova’s case less so. … The prosecutor general was in charge of the investigation into the atrocities against civilians in Bucha and Irpin. … We should remember that the Ukrainian version of what happened in these places did not always convince all the foreign journalists in Kyiv. The restrictions imposed on the press until Zelensky had prepared the terrain point to an unacceptable conditionality as regards gathering testimonies about the events there. … Venediktova’s dismissal does not dispel these doubts.”
Sacked for being too assertive
According to Novaya Gazeta Europa, internal power games played a decisive role in the suspension of the prosecutor general:
ISW Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, December 24, 2024
“Sources in government circles named the reason why Venediktova allegedly fell out of favor: it was her tense relationship with the presidential administration and especially its head Andriy Yermak. It was the media activity of the prosecutor general, who in the united national TV channels’ broadcasting marathon, is on air as often as the president, that aroused particular displeasure. Then there was her decision to expedite cases against Russian prisoners of war. This, according to participants in the negotiations with the Russians, could lead to Ukrainian prisoners going on trial in Russia and an end to prisoner exchanges.”
A failed experiment
Rzeczpospolita comments:
“Before working for the SBU, Bakanov had no experience in the security service, having been the head of the Kvaral 95 film studio which Zelensky owned. … His appointment was criticised from the start: critics stressed that an institution that is responsible for the security of the entire country should be run by someone with experience in the field. The government camp countered that ‘people outside the old system’ would clean up the secret service and end corruption. It was an experiment. The same goes for Venediktova, a university professor who had never worked in public prosecution before. … But apparently this experiment has failed under the conditions of war.”
A new chapter
This is a momentous step, Le Soir believes:
“The collateral damage from this decision could weaken the coordination of the intelligence services at the highest state level, given how dependent Zelensky was on his friend Bakanov. Since the war started on 24 February, this is the first time the top tier of the Ukrainian state has been impacted by a purge. The nuances are critical: we are talking about a confidante of Zelensky, not a member of the government or a high-ranking military officer. This is a sign that Zelensky has decided to open a new chapter in protecting himself and above all Ukraine against the Russian threat.”
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter
