OPINION: At NATO, Names Matter (a Little) and Need to UNITE

The Western military alliance has a lot on its plate: Its members have to figure out how to secure defense aid to Ukraine, deal with the impact of China’s relations with Russia, when to use their mutual defense assistance clause Article 5… and how to name new things.

We’re talking about the name for NATO’s role in coordinating the delivery of military assistance to Kyiv and training its armed forces. Its goal is largely to prevent Donald Trump, if he returns to the White House, from halting the flow of defense aid to Ukraine by moving that task away from politicians and into the hands of an institution.

It could have been easy, but it is not because someone in NATO initially called this coordination platform “The Ukraine Mission”.

Without a second thought, the Germans rebelled: We shall not name this platform a “mission”, they said, according to several people familiar with the process.

A “mission” for the Germans rings the same way as “troops on the ground”, a move which the country’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz bluntly disagrees with as he does not want the Western military alliance to get involved in the war.

But what do you name this thing, then? A framework, a mechanism, a hub, a platform, a command, an initiative, a coordination platform…? The problem is that if “mission” is too much for Berlin, most Russia-hawkish capitals will see any garden-variety term like “mechanism” as simply boring and bureaucratic.

Other Topics of Interest

At BRICS, Turkey Seeks to Expand Strategic Reach

Turkey is the first NATO member in BRICS, a bloc that sees itself as a counterweight to Western powers.

In the end, “UNITE” – standing for “Ukraine-NATO Initiative for Training and Equipment” – appears to have won the hard-to-get approval of the 32 members around the table, according to a draft document seen by Euractiv this week.

How many hours of debate it took to come to this, no self-respecting diplomat would probably ever dare to admit.

Another name used around the alliance’s HQ is NSATU, for “NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine”. NSATU, however, does not seem very likely to make the cut.

“We are still working on how to capture and describe it. We’ve been juggling possible acronyms,” a US State Department official said earlier this week. And just in case you did not know, nowhere do acronyms flourish as well as in the military.

Debates around names can take a while and are often not reported publicly, but they carry political weight and a message – one that the Kremlin could misuse as a reason to (wrongly) justify its war.

But as one other NATO diplomat put it, very few people care outside the NATO walls: “Sometimes, we argue and discuss things that only we care about, instead of trying to explain to people outside the HQ walls how important NATO’s role is”.

Plus, “no matter what we call it, it’s too late: We will always call it the NATO Mission to Ukraine,” a colleague of theirs added.

And in the meantime, Ukrainians are fighting on.

See this Brief for Euractiv by Aurélie Pugnet here

The views expressed in this article are the author’s and not necessarily those of Kyiv Post.